Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!ncar!boulder!sunybcs!rutgers!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Behaviour of setjmp/longjmp and registers
Message-ID: <9617@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 8 Feb 89 19:10:58 GMT
References: <9597@smoke.BRL.MIL> <546@marob.MASA.COM>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 6

In article <546@marob.MASA.COM> daveh@marob.masa.com (Dave Hammond) writes:
>You do have to rely on some sort of timeout, but there are adequate
>calls available ...

Apparently you missed the posting that explained why timeout is NOT
adequate.