Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!gatech!mcdchg!chinet!les
From: les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Behaviour of setjmp/longjmp and reg
Message-ID: <7697@chinet.chi.il.us>
Date: 12 Feb 89 22:11:26 GMT
References: <25@torsqnt.UUCP> <225800127@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>
Reply-To: les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell)
Organization: Chinet - Public Access Unix
Lines: 19

In article <225800127@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> mcdonald@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
>
>>>>>> The subject being escape sequences from terminals and their
>>problems >>>>>>>>
>
>Perhaps we should begin to make a really SERIOUS distinction between
>direct human input and other kinds.

*DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT THIS!*  The ability to arbitrarily redirect
input and output among devices/files/pipes/networks is what makes
the unix toolbox approach work.  Take that away and you would have
a fairly useless operating system.  Imagine wc working only with
typed input - how often would you use it?  A reasonable approach would
be to make the local machine (terminal/PC or whatever) handle more
operations locally and generate a standardized output stream.  Personally,
I don't care to waste any CPU time watching for meaningless transitions
of the <shift> key.

Les Mikesell