Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!ncar!tank!mimsy!chris
From: chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: C pointers
Message-ID: <15940@mimsy.UUCP>
Date: 14 Feb 89 14:09:33 GMT
References: <1707@shaffer.UUCP> <3374@xyzzy.UUCP> <11216@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> <11217@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742
Lines: 14

In article <11217@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> cjc@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com
(Chris Calabrese[mav]) writes:
>These things always confuse me to no end. ...

Indeed.

>I still think a pointer to a pointer is the best way.

No.  Steve Summit posted the correct answer (including the fact that,
other than in a very few special cases, C arrays MUST have a size).
Read his article.
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163)
Domain:	chris@mimsy.umd.edu	Path:	uunet!mimsy!chris