Xref: utzoo comp.sys.next:1480 comp.lang.postscript:1592
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!eecae!cps3xx!usenet
From: usenet@cps3xx.UUCP (Usenet file owner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next,comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Gratuitous incompatibility with NeXT postscript printer?
Message-ID: <1788@cps3xx.UUCP>
Date: 11 Feb 89 18:46:33 GMT
References: <509@gonzo.UUCP>
Reply-To: riordan@frith.UUCP (Mark Riordan {of Systems})
Organization: Engineering, Michigan State University, E. Lansing
Lines: 10

In article <509@gonzo.UUCP> sandra@gonzo.UUCP (Sandra Burch) writes:
>Are there different flavors of postscript?  Does this mean programs that
>write LaserWriter standard postscript won't work on the NeXT without
>rework?  Oooooooo, yuckers.

Along the same lines, what fonts are available for NeXT Postscript 
support?  I'm trying to figure out how likely it is that files
generated for a Laserwriter (perhaps by a PC wordprocessor) will
print on a NeXT.
Thanks.    riordanmr@clvax1.cl.msu.edu