Xref: utzoo comp.mail.headers:475 comp.mail.misc:1598 comp.mail.sendmail:487 comp.mail.uucp:2736 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uccba!uceng!ndcheg!iuvax!purdue!gatech!uflorida!rex!ukma!nrl-cmf!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!vixie From: vixie@decwrl.dec.com (Paul A Vixie) Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers,comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.sendmail,comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: Still trying to get smart routing working. Message-ID: Date: 8 Jan 89 23:36:20 GMT References: <412@execu.UUCP> <7094@xanth.cs.odu.edu> Sender: vixie@decwrl.dec.com Organization: DEC Western Research Lab Lines: 19 In-reply-to: wisner@xanth.cs.odu.edu's message of 8 Jan 89 10:50:50 GMT [Wisner] # And now I wax religious: # # I dislike Ease. [...] I agree with most of your conclusions about Ease. However, I recommend that anyone interested in understanding sendmail's raw configuration language get Ease, read all of its documentation, and play with it for a week. This is how I finally learned enough about sendmail.cf to write one from scratch. I might have stayed with Ease if it had made multi-line strings possible; my "Received:" headers spanned a physical newline and the grammar that came with Ease at that time would have taken massive hacking to make that possible. Also, Ease cannot generate the extensions used by IDA. No fault on the part of its implementors, since IDA didn't exist when Ease was first conceived. -- Paul Vixie Work: vixie@decwrl.dec.com decwrl!vixie +1 415 853 6600 Play: paul@vixie.sf.ca.us vixie!paul +1 415 864 7013