Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wasatch!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!purdue!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!ukc!etive!lfcs!jcb
From: jcb@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (Julian Bradfield)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Email to CompuServe?
Message-ID: <1354@etive.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 8 Feb 89 09:21:25 GMT
References: <114800001@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> <KARL.89Feb7090020@triceratops.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Sender: news@etive.ed.ac.uk
Reply-To: jcb@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (Julian Bradfield)
Organization: Laboratory for the Foundations of Computer Science, Edinburgh U
Lines: 10

In article <KARL.89Feb7090020@triceratops.cis.ohio-state.edu> 
karl@triceratops.cis.ohio-state.edu (Karl Kleinpaste) writes:

>Others: Rick Adams mentioned at the UUNET/Usenet BOF last week at
>Usenix that he is working on getting some of the other commercial
>providers to gateway through UUNET.  In large part, he is running into
>parochial attitudes demanding X.400 mailers, which he doesn't run.  He

Pardon? It is parochial to demand the use of the international
standard?