Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!pprg.unm.edu!hc!ames!amdcad!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!unido!nixpbe!ugun21!josef
From: josef@ugun21.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: Re: What format is common for 3.5 inch
Message-ID: <17700010@ugun21>
Date: 2 Feb 89 07:21:00 GMT
References: <201@nlgvax.UUCP>
Lines: 23
Nf-ID: #R:nlgvax.UUCP:-20100:ugun21:17700010:000:837
Nf-From: ugun21.UUCP!josef    Feb  2 08:21:00 1989


In his note, Geert Jan de Groot (geertj@nlgvax.UUCP) writes:

>I wonder if there is some standard for 3.5 inch (yes, I know, there
>is none officially, as my system uses yet-another-format on 5.25 inch :-),
>but would like to know if there is something spread like the OSBORNE-1
>format, which seems to be a common standard on 5.25 inch.

On my SB180FX I use exactly the same format with 3.5 inch drives I use
with 5.25 inch drives (the native SB180FX format: 788 KBytes, 40 Sectors
per track).
I can mail You any additional information (DPBs etc.)

		Josef Moellers

	paper mail:			e-mail:
c/o Nixdorf Computer AG		USA:  uunet!linus!nixbur!mollers.pad
Abt. EG-3			!USA: mcvax!unido!nixpbe!mollers.pad
Unterer Frankfurter Weg
D-4790 Paderborn
tel.: (+49) 5251 104691

Standard disclaimer: Blablabla opinion blablabla employer blablabla!