Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!bryan
From: bryan@cs.utexas.edu (Bryan Bayerdorffer @ Wit's End)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Follow-up:  2090A vs. Microbitics Hardframe
Message-ID: <159@mothra.cs.utexas.edu>
Date: 7 Feb 89 08:15:45 GMT
References: <3471@cs.Buffalo.EDU> <4039@cs.Buffalo.EDU>
Reply-To: bryan@cs.utexas.edu
Organization: Spam Detection & Removal Squad, Austin, TX
Lines: 22
Spam-Content: Negligible

In article <4039@cs.Buffalo.EDU> jmpiazza@cs.Buffalo.EDU (Joseph M. Piazza) writes:
=-
=-	Thanks to all who responded.  It turns out that the most crucial
=-difference is the fact the the Hardframe isn't readily available.  So, I
=-now own a A2090A and I'm very happy with it.  

	I guess next day air from InterComputing in TX for $239.00 is 'not
readily available.'  Then again, this was a month ago, when I got mine.  The
amazing thing was, even with TX sales tax, iC was still cheaper than anyplace
else...	That said, the Hardframe + Quantum 80S blows the jumpers off anything
else, especially my old 2090 + Miniscribe 2650.  As far as the GVP hardcards
go, the Hardframe is faster, more sturdily constructed, and you get to choose
ANY SCSI drive.

	No contest.
 ______________________________________________________________________________ 
/_____/_____/_____/_____/_____/_____/_____/_____/_____/_____/_____/_____/_____/
|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|
_No dark sarcasm in the classroom|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|___
|____Teachers leave the kids alone__|_____|_____|_____|_bryan@cs.utexas.edu___|
___|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|{vertebrae...}!cs.utexas.edu!bryan_|___
|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|