Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!att!mtunh!mkd From: mkd@mtunh.ATT.COM (Mark Darby) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Serial Ports Message-ID: <646@mtunh.ATT.COM> Date: 8 Feb 89 17:34:26 GMT References: <171@algedi.UUCP> <4092@omepd.UUCP> <433@madnix.UUCP> <450@madnix.UUCP> Organization: AT&T ISL Middletown NJ USA Lines: 33 In article <450@madnix.UUCP>, perry@madnix.UUCP (Perry Kivolowitz) writes: > In article <645@mtunh.ATT.COM> mkd@mtunh.ATT.COM (Mark Darby) writes: > > [Question regarding whether the multi-serialport implementation works with an Amiga 500 and an expansion cage...] > >such as Bills' Board, Expansion Technologies' Tool Box (an A2000 2 slot > >expansion cage), or Pacific Peripherals' SubSystem 500? > >Mark K. Darby > > I have no idea. There's nothing special about the requirement of our Twin-X > board. It uses a completely standard Zorro II bus interface and has never > shown caused a problem in any of the systems we've tried out at all the Then I suppose my question should be stated as such: The Zorro II bus interface is a 100-pin interface while the expansion connector for the A500 is 86-pin(correct me if I am wrong). Does the twin-x board use any one the bus lines available in the zorroII(i.e. A2000) bus interface which may not be (is not) available on the A500? Have you ever tested your boards on any A500 based equipment? It's not totally unreasonable to expect that A500 owners want at least some limited expansion capability. I expect that an A500 user who wants expansion capability would only want it to support one or two particular applications as opposed to having multiple ( >2 ) applications like that possible with the A2000's internal expansion bus and slots. It's great that you are first out on the market with this capability. I just hope you haven't ignored the A500 owners in doing so. ;-) Mark K. Darby AT&T Bell Laboratories AT&T: (201)957-2706 200 Laurel Ave. uucp:..!att!mtunh!mkd Middletown, NJ 07748