Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!nrl-cmf!healy From: healy@nrl-cmf.UUCP (Liam Healy) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Amiga & Mathematica Summary: Mathematica requires memory Keywords: only maybe ... Message-ID: <170@nrl-cmf.UUCP> Date: 11 Feb 89 20:00:22 GMT References: <00VO0520TZ1010ep0M.@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <3026@ihlpm.ATT.COM> Reply-To: healy@cmsun.nrl.navy.mil (Liam Healy) Organization: NRL Connection Machine Facility, Washington, DC Lines: 38 In article <3026@ihlpm.ATT.COM> jmdavis@ihlpm.ATT.COM (Davis) writes: >> >> Her reply was: >> > Kim, >> > without virtual memory, Mathematica requires approximately 3 meg >> > of memory and not many Amiga users have this much. >What!?!?!? How much memory does it take to run in a Mac. The book I >have seen on Mathematica indicates that it runs on Macintoshes, not >only Mac II's. I can't believe there are that many more folks out >there who have 3 MB on good ole Mac I's. > >Anyway, Even if it is 3 Megs on a Mac, I am curious if they have investigated >the operating system on the amiga. Seems like they could save some memory >by writing an intelligent port. I have used Mathematica extensively on a Mac II. Technically it will run in 2 MB, but is effectively useless. I would say the practical minimum is 4 MB. 8 MB is nice. I don't know what this implies for the Amiga, but even if it requires less than on the Mac, it will still require a lot (compared to the standard configuration). On the other hand, a few megabytes is no longer outlandish or even uncommon. >Finally, the comment about Virtual Memory, well, wouldn't overlays be >possible here? While some of the beauty of Mathematica is that you can The possibility occured to me too. I don't see why not. I would like to see Mathematica in a multi-tasking environment like the Amiga. Maybe with an AREXX port? >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Mike Davis ..!att!ihlpm!jmdavis Liam Healy Naval Research Laboratory healy@cmsun.nrl.navy.mil