Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!jgary
From: jgary@ms.uky.edu (James E. Gary)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Kickstart Eliminator
Summary: Yes, but what about KickBench
Message-ID: <11074@s.ms.uky.edu>
Date: 13 Feb 89 22:32:04 GMT
References: <5948@leadsv.UUCP: <1372@agora.UUCP>
Reply-To: jgary@ms.uky.edu (James E. Gary)
Organization: U of Kentucky, Mathematical Sciences
Lines: 16

In article <1372@agora.UUCP> billsey@agora.UUCP (Bill Seymour) writes:
>From article <5948@leadsv.UUCP:, by lord@leadsv.UUCP (Parker Lord):
  [stuff about kickstart elimination HARDWARE delete]

That's fine, but what about kickbench. I personally don't mind the
time required to load kickstart, it is the disk swap that bothers me.
I had a disk called kickbench (pd, there is a commercial variation)
with kickstart/workbench on one disk. That was a 1.2 disk. What _I_
want is a 1.3 kickbench disk. Can anyone help me there?


-- 
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James Gary   jgary@ms.uky.edu     | You Klingon sons, you've killed|
|    University of Kentucky         | my bastard!  -Kames Jirk       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+