Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!nic.MR.NET!umn-d-ub!umn-cs!meccts!prw
From: prw@meccts.MECC.MN.ORG (Paul Wenker)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: NOTE
Message-ID: <3891@meccts.MECC.MN.ORG>
Date: 8 Feb 89 14:46:46 GMT
References: <8902070736.AA08803@crash.cts.com>
Reply-To: prw@meccts.UUCP (Paul Wenker)
Organization: MECC Technical Services, St. Paul, MN
Lines: 14

In article <8902070736.AA08803@crash.cts.com> pnet01!pro-sol!pro-ascii!pro-gemini!pro-generic!jgraham@nosc.mil writes:
>When refering to the 65C02 instruction that will increment the accumulator
>(identified by HEX $1A) it is NOT called "INC A" or "INC" rather "INA" as per
>the standards described by NCR in their tech note on thee 65C02.


Does it really matter what someone calls the instruction as long as we
know what they mean?  Besides, the Western Digital spec sheet for the
65816 lists the instruction as "INC A" with the alternate mnemonic of
"INA".


-Paul Wenker				UUCP: prw@meccts.MECC.MN.ORG
-MECC, Advanced Development		AppleLink: MECC.TECH