Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!ames!killer!ltf From: ltf@killer.DALLAS.TX.US (Lance Franklin) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: about Seagates... Message-ID: <7066@killer.DALLAS.TX.US> Date: 7 Feb 89 06:43:17 GMT References: <92.23EB72B5@muadib.FIDONET.ORG> <6135@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <677@sactoh0.UUCP> <517@rpi.edu> Reply-To: ltf@killer.Dallas.TX.US (Lance Franklin) Organization: The Unix(R) Connection BBS, Dallas, Tx Lines: 34 In article <517@rpi.edu> mcintyre@turing.cs.rpi.edu (David McIntyre) writes: >In article <677@sactoh0.UUCP> bkbarret@sactoh0.UUCP (Brent K. Barrett) writes: >>In article <6135@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>, jwbirdsa@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (James Webster Birdsall) writes: >>> Wait a minute! I thought Seagate drives were supposed to be some of >>> the best. Have I been misinformed? >> No, you haven't. In the PC world, Seagate is about as good as you >>get. Apparently Ed Maurer up there is the one who's been >>misinformed. >Brett must have missed the 100's of messages previously in this group >about failed, no-good, worthless 225's. Seagate 225's are the only >hard drive that had a 40% DOA rate at the store I worked in, and many >of those that I told people to buy are now dead. Not to mention the ST251's that last about a year, then start refusing to spin up... My friend had 3 ST251's on his BBS...they were all about a year old, and they all started to have the same problem...on power up, they would refuse to spin up, doing so only after he tapped them a few times, or gave the thing a little twist with his finger. In my office, another ST251, about a year old, has started failing in the same way. So, what is the MTBF for an ST251, anyway? :-) Lance -- +-------------------------+ +-----------------------------------------------+ | Lance T Franklin | | I never said that! It must be some kind of a | | ltf@killer.DALLAS.TX.US | | forgery...I gotta change that password again. | +-------------------------+ +-----------------------------------------------+