Xref: utzoo news.admin:4736 sci.electronics:5069 comp.sys.ibm.pc:24421
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!gatech!emcard!stiatl!john
From: john@stiatl.UUCP (John DeArmond)
Newsgroups: news.admin,sci.electronics,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: network public domain?
Message-ID: <3028@stiatl.UUCP>
Date: 9 Feb 89 05:02:34 GMT
References: <2712@looking.UUCP> <1449@papaya.bbn.com> <2944@stiatl.UUCP> <24371@amdcad.AMD.COM> <1389@mtunb.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: john@stiatl.UUCP (John DeArmond)
Organization: Sales Technologies Inc., Atlanta, GA
Lines: 20

In article <1389@mtunb.ATT.COM> dmt@mtunb.UUCP (Dave Tutelman) writes:
>
>Phil,
>Please don't be put off by the rantings of someone who is wrong.
>(The first time I wrote, "...doesn't know the difference between public
>domain and freely-distributable copyrighted stuff";  but I have no
>evidence that John doesn't know the difference.)
>

Hardly "ranting" sir.  There is no such legal definition of the term
"frely distributable copyrighted stuff"  I have a great deal of 
very expensive and hard won experience on this subject.  Rather
than waste net.bandwidth, I'll vector interested parties to 
net.admin for support of  this statement.

John
-- 
John De Armond, WD4OQC                     | Manual? ... What manual ?!? 
Sales Technologies, Inc.    Atlanta, GA    | This is Unix, My son, You 
...!gatech!stiatl!john                     | just GOTTA Know!!!