Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!pprg.unm.edu!hc!ames!amdcad!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!munnari!otc!metro!basser!usage!ccadfa!csadfa!rap
From: rap@csadfa.oz (Robert Pearson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: survey: to spool or not
Message-ID: <1789@csadfa.oz>
Date: 31 Jan 89 21:53:08 GMT
References: <4838@mnetor.UUCP>
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, University College, UNSW, ADFA, Canberra, Australia
Lines: 17

From article <4838@mnetor.UUCP>, by frank@mnetor.UUCP (Frank Kolnick):
> In article <476@grand.UUCP> day@grand.UUCP (Dave Yost) writes:
>>Print spooling is obviously a desirable thing.
>>Yet, some people end up not using the spooler
>>they bought for one reason or another.
>> ...
	I regularly use both SupserLaserspool , from an XP20,
and Superspool, from an XP20 and , of the disk on a Mac II.
I have only used the dataframe version of Superlaserspool. But
both versions of the other. 
	They work most of the time. I seem to have trouble
with Textures. Not isolated yet, and early versions had difficulties
with colour. TheImagewriter works well with Pagemaker (3.0).
Otherwise they work well, including under multifinder .
They really save time.
 Robert Pearson
rap@cs.adfa.oz.au