Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!mace.cc.purdue.edu!dls
From: dls@mace.cc.purdue.edu (David L Stevens)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: NeXT --- not worth the effort (yet)?
Message-ID: <1621@mace.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: 4 Feb 89 18:55:31 GMT
References: <21404@ames.arc.nasa.gov> <18081@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>
Reply-To: dls@mace.cc.purdue.edu (David L Stevens)
Organization: PUCC UNIX Group
Lines: 12


	I've crashed my NeXT 3 times  since I got it a few weeks ago, but for
pre-release software, I think it's great. I'd rather have NeXT 0.8 than any of
its current "production" competitors.
	I've seen bad (I mean really awful) software in every vendor release
I've seen, and all are bigger players with more money and time invested than
NeXT. What's the point of the NeXT-bashing here? Are you guys disappointed that
it isn't something from the Land of Oz?
	Real steps forward come with bugs. Big deal. If you don't want a NeXT,
don't buy one; it'll leave more for the realists in the world...
-- 
					+-DLS  (dls@mace.cc.purdue.edu)