Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!blake!mrc@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU From: mrc@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (Mark Crispin) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Jobs on source code Message-ID: <881@blake.acs.washington.edu> Date: 14 Feb 89 02:45:38 GMT Sender: news@blake.acs.washington.edu Distribution: na Organization: Mendou Zaibatsu, Tomobiki-Cho, Butsumetsu-Shi Lines: 35 Steve Jobs was (again) barraged with comments about the source code issue at last week's NeXT developer's camp. As one of the more vocal barragers, I'll try to summarize what he said. I will refrain from any editorial comment, other than noting that he seemed to be speaking off the cuff and/or thinking out loud as opposed to stating a policy. I am writing from memory, so there is a non-zero possibility that my own prejudiced interpretation of what Jobs said may show through: . NeXT plans to announce a source code policy soon, perhaps this week. . NeXT does not plan to distribute all source code, but rather some subset that seems to encompass what everybody cares about. . Source code distribution will be limited to small organizations within universities that have a demonstrated need for their "research". . There will be no charge for source code. Jobs made some comment to the effect that if university groups need certain source for their research NeXT will give it to them. . NeXT will *not* distribute source code to a university or company as a whole, but rather to the small group inside it that "needs" it. . That small group may *not* distribute that source OR BINARIES GENERATED FROM THAT SOURCE (I initially assumed this was a slip, but Jobs confirmed this is what he means) to any other NeXT systems on campus. The only exceptions will be made on a case-by-case, program-by-program basis by NeXT. The stated purpose was to abate a problem in which some individual or group changes program X on all NeXT's on campus which breaks vendor program Y causing a different individual or group on campus to complain to vendor Y bogusly. I hope I have repeated what Jobs said fairly.