Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:11488 comp.unix.aux:657 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!ncar!umigw!umbio!ibiza!aem From: aem@ibiza.Miami.Edu (a.e.mossberg) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.aux Subject: Re: terminfo vs. termcap Keywords: Why do we need two different terminal capability widgets? Message-ID: <1362@umbio.MIAMI.EDU> Date: 3 Feb 89 23:44:26 GMT References: <6966@june.cs.washington.edu> <358@tcsc3b2.UUCP> <1312@umbio.MIAMI.EDU> <6912@ig.ig.com> Sender: netnews@umbio.MIAMI.EDU Reply-To: aem@Mthvax.Miami.Edu (a.e.mossberg) Organization: University of Miami Hertz Lab, Coral Gables, FL Lines: 22 In <6912@ig.ig.com>, wrote: >In article <1312@umbio.MIAMI.EDU>, aem@ibiza.Miami.Edu (a.e.mossberg) writes: >> /etc/termcap is BSD. AT&T came up with a compiled version which loads >> somewhat faster, and uses very similar source files. Most, if not all, BSD >> systems use /etc/termcap. Terminfo is used by Sys V and derivatives (A/IX, >> A/UX, etc). >Just a note to say that /etc/termcap didn't originate at Berkeley. >Version 7 and System III from AT&T used it, too. Possibly true. The major program that uses termcap is curses, which was written at Berkeley, and all of the other files that use termcap style information (printcap, acucap) are for berkeley programs. And if ATT developed termcap, where is anything from them that used it? Why didn't they expand it rather than come up with terminfo? The only systems I've seen without termcap have been System III. aem a.e.mossberg aem@mthvax.miami.edu MIAVAX::AEM (Span) aem@umiami.BITNET (soon) Masturbation is fun...it makes a cloudy day sunny. - Debbie Harry