Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:4781 comp.unix.microport:2768 news.groups:7170
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!nrl-cmf!ukma!cwjcc!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!att!alberta!ubc-cs!van-bc!norsat!dave
From: dave@norsat.UUCP (Dave Binette)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport,news.groups
Subject: Re: The right name for the 386 unix group
Summary: Yes to comp.unix.at386
Message-ID: <10@norsat.UUCP>
Date: 30 Jan 89 21:04:45 GMT
References: <ek3ic#1KMWg0=eric@snark.uu.net> <661@pcrat.UUCP>
Reply-To: dave@norsat.UUCP (Dave Binette)
Distribution: na
Organization: Norsat International Research Inc. Surrey, BC, CANADA
Lines: 16

In article <ek3ic#1KMWg0=eric@snark.uu.net> eric@snark.uu.net (Eric S. Raymond) writes:
>That suggests a solution. Call it
>
>		comp.unix.at386

I like it! comp.unix.at386

Other architectures are not of interest to me at all, at least not in this
context.  I'd get a lot more use out of this group if it were restricted to
SCO only but i suppose that is unreasonable.

When I need machine comparisons I can generally find some info in trade 
magazines and product reviews.

What I would like from this group is reading comments about new releases
of OS and utility software by real users.