Path: utzoo!telly!ddsw1!lll-winken!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!PARIS.ICS.UCI.EDU!beshers%carcvax.brc.uconn.edu
From: beshers%carcvax.brc.uconn.edu@PARIS.ICS.UCI.EDU (George Beshers)
Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug
Subject: Re: g++ 1.32 is lax on protection
Message-ID: <8901280236.aa02065@PARIS.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Date: 27 Jan 89 18:41:26 GMT
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 7

So is 1.2.1 (!).  I see your point.  Actually, my belief is that you
might want both possibilities.  Consider a container object for a
class X, then one possibility is to put the links in a protected
portion and derive the container class from the class supported.

				George
				beshers@carcvax.brc.uconn.edu