Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!unmvax.cs.unm.edu!lee
From: lee@unmvax.cs.unm.edu (Lee Ward)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Changes to the monthly postings (for rec.humor.funny)
Keywords: administivia
Message-ID: <2269@unmvax.unm.edu>
Date: 6 Feb 89 21:59:21 GMT
References: <2706@looking.UUCP> <2844@epimass.EPI.COM> <2714@looking.UUCP> <2847@epimass.EPI.COM> <2718@looking.UUCP>
Sender: news@unmvax.unm.edu
Reply-To: lee@unmvax.cs.unm.edu (Lee Ward)
Organization: University of New Mexico at Albuquerque
Lines: 19

I would like to ask Mr. Templeton two public questions regarding
the below post:

In article <2718@looking.UUCP> brad@looking.UUCP (Brad Templeton) writes:
>
>I will admit people seem more worried about this than I expected.  Let
>me say that in no way am I out looking for legal actions or the removal
>of sections of the net from the distribution list.  Nobody is going to
>become an unwitting copyright violator because they forward groups to
>neighbours.  Unless this attack forces me off usenet, I have no plans
>to interfere in any way with the actions of free usenet sites.
>

From the article I get that the "this", in the first sentence, is the current
discussion or "attack". First, is my interpretation correct in that? Second,
in what way do you intend to interfere with free usenet sites should you
be forced off the net?

			--Lee (Ward)