Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!hadron!inco!mack From: mack@inco.UUCP (Dave Mack) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: compilation copyright question Keywords: poster's rights Message-ID: <4536@inco.UUCP> Date: 10 Feb 89 17:09:33 GMT References: <5982@leadsv.UUCP> <25545@apple.Apple.COM> Reply-To: mack@inco.UUCP (Dave Mack) Organization: McDonnell Douglas-INCO, McLean, VA Lines: 33 Excerpted without permission under the "Fair Use" provisions of US and international copyright laws: In article <25545@apple.Apple.COM> chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Raspach) writes: >3) implicit copyrights are on published material. Whether posting to USENET > constitutes 'publishing' it is not known -- there's no legal precedent > I'm aware of. And if you ask me, I wouldn't want to bet either way on that > issue. > >The bottom line: If you post something, you own a copyright to that material. You're assuming an answer to 3). If this is correct, then it should be possible for me to sue every site that receives/transmits this article, since that constitutes copying. ("Yer Honor, the defendants, all 11,000 of 'em, infringed on my abiliity to make a livelihood by making thousands if not millions of copies of my postings, which I had planned to collect into a bestseller entitled _The Collected Postings of David Mack_. Now, I'm a reasonable man, yer Honor. All I want is a thousand bucks damages from each site.") If I can't sue, then I must have given up some of my rights by the act of posting. Which rights? In the long run, it would be much safer to deal with the net as if it were a publicly-accessible broadcast medium. -- Copyright 1989 David W. Mack. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Any duplication or retransmission of this work by any means, whether mechanical or electronic, without the prior written consent of the author is a violation of the applicable national and international copyright laws and may be prosecuted to the fullest extent allowed by those laws. ;-)