Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!lll-winken!uunet!mitel!sce!cognos!geovision!alastair
From: alastair@geovision.uucp (Alastair Mayer)
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Re: NASA calls for proposals regarding Reusable Reentry Satellite (Forwarded)
Message-ID: <526@geovision.UUCP>
Date: 27 Jan 89 15:39:56 GMT
References: <20996@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: alastair@geovision.UUCP (Alastair Mayer)
Organization: GeoVision Corp, Ottawa, Canada
Lines: 29

In article <20996@ames.arc.nasa.gov> yee@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Peter E. Yee) writes:
>Paula Cleggett
>NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C.              January 18, 1989
>
>Kari Fluegel
>Johnson Space Center, Houston
>
>
>RELEASE:  89-6
>
>NASA CALLS FOR PROPOSALS REGARDING REUSABLE REENTRY SATELLITE

 [.. a whole bunch of stuff deleted ..]

>roughly 6-feet in diameter and weighing more than 2,000 pounds 
>with a useful payload of 500 pounds.

 Hmm, does that mean that if I can design a 6-foot diameter reusable
vehicle with a payload of 500 pounds, and the vehicle only weighs, say 1000
pounds, that I have to design in a bunch of ballast to bring it up
to the "more than 2000 lb" spec'd in the RFP?

 Sounds like a NASA proposal, all right :-)

-- 
"The problem is not that spaceflight is expensive,  | Alastair J.W. Mayer
therefore only the government can do it, but that   | alastair@geovision.UUCP
only the government is doing spaceflight, therefore | al@BIX
it is expensive."                                   |