Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!rutgers!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!sloane
From: sloane@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Bob Sloane)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: COMBINE script
Message-ID: <3779@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Date: 21 Feb 89 09:00:57 GMT
References: <2858@udccvax1.acs.udel.EDU> <2168@hoqax.UUCP>
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
Lines: 12

In article <2168@hoqax.UUCP>, twb@hoqax.UUCP (T.W. Beattie) writes:
> Give people a chance to help you.
> Maybe I should GUESS your address from the headers on the message :-).

Is there some reason why the Reply-to: header in the original message should
not be trusted to contain the senders actual address?  Do you really need to
"GUESS"???
+-------------------+-------------------------------------+------------------+
|  Bob Sloane        \Internet: SLOANE@KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU/Anything I said is |
|  Computer Center    \ BITNET: SLOANE@UKANVAX.BITNET   / my opinion, not my |
|  University of Kansas\  AT&T: (913) 864-0444         /  employer's.        |
+-----------------------+-----------------------------+----------------------+