Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!ateng!chip
From: chip@ateng.ateng.com (Chip Salzenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: COMBINE script
Message-ID: <1989Feb24.121810.19673@ateng.ateng.com>
Date: 24 Feb 89 17:18:10 GMT
References: <2858@udccvax1.acs.udel.EDU> <2168@hoqax.UUCP> <3779@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Organization: A T Engineering, Tampa, FL
Lines: 16

According to sloane@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Bob Sloane):
>Is there some reason why the Reply-to: header in the original message should
>not be trusted to contain the senders actual address?

The default configuration of the "rn" newsreader generates incorrect
Reply-To headers on domainish sites.  For example, when posting from
unicorn.ateng.com, the Reply-To field is "user@unicorn.UUCP", which is not
at all correct.

>Do you really need to "GUESS"???

On occasion.
-- 
Chip Salzenberg             <chip@ateng.com> or <uunet!ateng!chip>
A T Engineering             Me?  Speak for my company?  Surely you jest!
	  "It's no good.  They're tapping the lines."