Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!itsgw!steinmetz!uunet!ingr!bethune
From: bethune@ingr.com (Dave Bethune)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans
Subject: Re: Whose is your favorite Ethernet tranceiver?
Summary: What are the problems with Interlan?
Message-ID: <4023@ingr.com>
Date: 21 Feb 89 18:39:25 GMT
References: <2831@stpstn.UUCP>
Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, Al
Lines: 11

In article <2831@stpstn.UUCP>, aad@stpstn.UUCP (Anthony A. Datri) writes:
> 
> I'm looking at the prospect of replacing several 3Com 3C100 ethernet
> tranceivers, and I'd like to get some opinions on what to replace them with.
> All current tranceivers are intrusive, but non-intrusive ones can be considered
> as well.  So far, I'm between the newer 3Com ones and Cabletron's.  I seem
> to remember some problems with Interlan's offerings, and I've had experience
> with TCL's.

I'm curious about the problems that you had (or heard about) with the Interlan
transceivers. Could you elaborate on this ?