Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!agate!garnet.berkeley.edu!naparst
From: naparst@garnet.berkeley.edu (Harold Naparst)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: Fortran 8x ?
Message-ID: <20420@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 15 Feb 89 18:25:20 GMT
References: <20377@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <89802@sun.uucp>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 21

In article <89802@sun.uucp> khb@sun.UUCP (Keith Bierman Sun Tactical Engineering) writes:
>As I write, the X3J3 (ANSI committee) is working hard to come up with
>the text by Friday, then there will be two draft documents, ANSI and
>ISO. There will be another round of public review, and then
>(*hopefully*) _an_ ordained standard which both bodies can live with.

But this still doesn't answer my question. Have there been any major changes
to the first proposal, and if so, what ?
 
>Every public comment is gone over, in painful detail. Very few of the
>points are any different than discussions the committee had years
>ago... nonetheless the standard is mutating to conform with the
>comments (WG5 and public) in several important areas.

Why didn't I get a response to my comment ?

Harold Naparst
Harold Naparst (415)-548-4652
  UUCP		{tektronix,dual,sun,ihnp4,decvax}!ucbvax!garnet!naparst
  New style	naparst@garnet.berkeley.edu	
  ARPA | CSNET	naparst%garnet@berkeley.edu