Xref: utzoo comp.text:3318 comp.lang.postscript:1653
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!leah!bingvaxu!sunybcs!boulder!hartzell@beagle
From: hartzell@beagle (George Hartzell)
Newsgroups: comp.text,comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Large postscript files to a laserwriter
Keywords: TeX, tex, PostScript
Message-ID: <6756@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 18 Feb 89 23:50:33 GMT
References: <1936@goanna.oz> <11384@cgl.ucsf.EDU>
Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU
Reply-To: hartzell@beagle (George Hartzell)
Followup-To: comp.text
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 14
In-reply-to: rodgers@maxwell.mmwb.ucsf.edu (Richard Rodgers)

In article <11384@cgl.ucsf.EDU>, rodgers@maxwell (Richard Rodgers) writes:
>
>The original posting complained about the loss of portions of TeX output
>when the output from a DVI to PostScript filter is used, and the document is
>large.  We solve this by using Nelson Beebe's superb filter "dvialw," which

We had similar problems, which we solved by upgrading to transcript
release 2.1.  Apparently there were some problems with flow control
between transcript and the printer.
g.
-- 
George Hartzell			                  (303) 492-4535
 MCD Biology, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309
hartzell@Boulder.Colorado.EDU  ..!{ncar,nbires}!boulder!hartzell