Xref: utzoo comp.sys.next:1589 comp.lang.postscript:1702
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!rutgers!cmcl2!phri!roy
From: roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next,comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Gratuitous incompatibility with NeXT postscript printer?
Message-ID: <3704@phri.UUCP>
Date: 26 Feb 89 16:07:50 GMT
References: <509@gonzo.UUCP> <17633@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <253@ccsrd14.UUCP>
Reply-To: roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Public Health Research Inst. (NY, NY)
Lines: 11

andrew@ccssrv.UUCP (Andrew Grant) writes:
> The need for Laserwriter compatiblity rather than Postscript compatiblity
> is the reason that so few Postscript 'clones' are currently available.

	Is this not a fault of the PS-generating applications, and not of
the printers?
-- 
Roy Smith, System Administrator
Public Health Research Institute
{allegra,philabs,cmcl2,rutgers}!phri!roy -or- phri!roy@uunet.uu.net
"The connector is the network"