Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!husc6!encore!cloud9!jjmhome!cpoint!martillo From: martillo@cpoint.UUCP (Joacim Martillo) Newsgroups: comp.os.misc Subject: Re: Why Unix is good (was Re: Unix bigotry) LONG Message-ID: <2059@cpoint.UUCP> Date: 20 Feb 89 17:38:44 GMT References: <117@spectra.COM> <692@cvbnet2.UUCP> <3101@ficc.uu.net> <285@bnr-fos.UUCP> <497@cwjcc.CWRU.Edu> Reply-To: martillo@cpoint.UUCP (Joacim Martillo) Organization: Clearpoint Research Corp., Hopkinton Mass. Lines: 59 In article <497@cwjcc.CWRU.Edu> edvax@skybridge.UUCP (Ed Reznichenko) writes: :In article <285@bnr-fos.UUCP> schow@bnr-public.UUCP (Stanley Chow) writes: ::Willaim B. Pace claims in <1170@spectra.COM> that AOS code is much ::cleaner than Unix code. ::Karl lehenbauer replies in <31010ficc.uu.net: saying so what? Given :: - No concept of full screen graphics. Unix seems to be still firmly :: tied to the day of 75 baud teletypes. (I know about X-windows :: and such, in fact I am using it right now). All the commands :: seem to be designed to minimize typing or half-duplex echo time. :: - I am sitting here typing this note in "vi" - the so called :: full screen editior of choice (see the man pages). I have used :: editors a decade ago that were better. (I use Micro-Emacs at home :: on my Amiga, but even that still reeks of teletype). :: For text editing, I will take a locally attached IBM 3278-4 anytime :: (since I can then use XEDIT and REXX). :------------------------------------ :This poster is asking for it. :