Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!ingr!brooke
From: brooke@ingr.com (Brooke King)
Newsgroups: comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: Evolving Comment Styles
Message-ID: <4098@ingr.com>
Date: 24 Feb 89 23:40:45 GMT
References: <9674@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Reply-To: brooke@ingr.UUCP (Brooke King)
Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL -- but opinions are all mine!
Lines: 36

In article <9674@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> jerbil@cit-vax.caltech.edu (Stainless Steel Gerbil [Joe Beckenbach]) writes:
| 
| 	As I was following the thread of discussion about comments and
| 'good coding style' with regards to these, I thought of a neat little shift
| which I think embodies what this facet of software engineering should head
| towards: not "self-documenting code" but "self-coding documents".
| 
| 	The Hyper-Programming idea thrown out by one participant gives the 
| right slant: combining the documentation, graphics, and code into a more
| comprehensive source.

| 	Just my two cents and a new twist on an 'old' viewpoint.

Some old information which is somewhat related:

Iris Vessey and Ron Weber, "Stuctured Tools and Conditional
Logic:  An Empirical Investigation," _Communications of the ACM_,
January 1986, Vol 29, Nr. 1, pp. 48-57.

The article empirically hints at what we all feel, that linear
programming languages are inferior to well-done multi-dimensional
(perhaps graphical) programming languages.

The whole August 1985 issue (on visual programming) of _IEEE
Computer_ is pretty interesting and some of it was referenced in
Vessey and Weber.

Anyone have any pointers to some more recent work (that is also
not too heavy)?

| Joe Beckenbach	joe@csvax.caltech.edu	Caltech 256-80, Pasadena CA 91125
| Users I'd like to see:
| 	Postmaster@link.L5.edu		gorby@party.kremlin.gov.cccp
-- 

brooke@ingr.com uunet!ingr!brooke W+1 205 7727796 H+1 205 8950824