Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: __STDC__ and non-conforming ANSI C compilers
Message-ID: <9696@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 23 Feb 89 14:13:09 GMT
References: <355@sdti.SDTI.COM> <11762@haddock.ima.isc.com> <9075@elsie.UUCP> <9710@ihlpb.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 9

In article <9710@ihlpb.ATT.COM> nevin1@ihlpb.UUCP (55528-Liber,N.J.) writes:
>In article <9075@elsie.UUCP> ado@elsie.UUCP (Arthur David Olson) writes:
>|#if __STDC__ >= 1
>You don't really want to do this, since the future standard may not be
>100% upward compatable with ANSI C 89.

It's much more likely that "#if __STDC__ > 0" will be what you want
under a future revision of the Standard than that "#if __STDC__ == 1"
will be.