Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!hal!nic.MR.NET!xanth!cs.odu.edu!tadguy
From: tadguy@cs.odu.edu (Tad Guy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: UW
Summary: UW 2.10 needs ptys and sockets...
Keywords: UW DNET Amiga SystemV
Message-ID: <7790@xanth.cs.odu.edu>
Date: 17 Feb 89 00:26:44 GMT
References: <533@wsu-cs> <6046@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> <7769@xanth.cs.odu.edu> <394@lakesys.UUCP>
Sender: news@xanth.cs.odu.edu
Reply-To: tadguy@cs.odu.edu (Tad Guy)
Distribution: na
Organization: Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
Lines: 20
In-reply-to: mikes@lakesys.UUCP (Mike Shawaluk)

In article <7769@xanth.cs.odu.edu> tadguy@cs.odu.edu (Tad Guy) writes:
> [ drippy gooey praise for Dnet ]

In article <394@lakesys.UUCP>, mikes@lakesys (Mike Shawaluk) writes:
>Yes, but what about us poor souls who live on SystemV systems? 

I guess we could put you'all in the garage for now... :-)

>I can't remember whether UW will run under SystemV or not...

A quick look at UW 2.10 shows a need for ptys, sockets and Berkeley
ioctl's like FIONREAD.  If you have a SystemV with all those things,
you should be ok. :-)

This is probably an obsolete version of UW by now, though.

	...tad

-- 
Tad Guy         <tadguy@cs.odu.edu>     Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA