Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ulowell!cbmvax!higgin From: higgin@cbmvax.UUCP (Paul Higginbottom MKT) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Wild Cards, file syntax (was: arp CD command change???) Message-ID: <6041@cbmvax.UUCP> Date: 22 Feb 89 15:58:37 GMT References: <8902131846.AA21527@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> <35960@bbn.COM> <5985@cbmvax.UUCP> Reply-To: higgin@cbmvax.UUCP (Paul Higginbottom MKT) Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA Lines: 41 In article deven@pawl.rpi.edu (Deven Corzine) writes: $First off, . to "" is NOT such a simple translation, because shells $won't usually pass the quotes without quoting THEM. AmigaDOS shell does pass them. $I see : vs. / for $root as more of a preference issue, but I prefer /. ^^^ Fine. Subjective Opionion (S.O) $I don't like / for the parent directory. It's just weird. But that's preference, ^^^ $I'd rather use "../file" than "/file" $to refer to a file in the parent directory. S.O $It is clearer and less prone to error. (Accidental keybounce on the /, etc...) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ S.O. UNIX is MORE characters which would seem to make IT more prone to error. I can see no reason why ../file is clearer than /file. It is clearer to one who is more used for the former. As for key bounce - it's been a while since I heard that as a reason to change a DOS. $Again, Unix is designed such that you can easily replace the $shell, which is not so trivial a task on the Amiga. But it has been done and many people are happy with the results. $Also, the fact that most Amiga shells run under a CLI is a horrible kludge in my $book. UNIX has been around a bit longer than AmigaDOS :-) Also, HOW big is UNIX? I guess I really shouldn't have replied... . FYI I am a big UNIX fan as well as an Amiga fan obviously, but having used so many different "standards" and user interfaces over the years, I just kind of roll with the differences. AmigaDOS, DOS, VMS, Ultrix, EMACS, vi, EDT, ed (--you choke--), etc. Paul.