Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!super!rminnich
From: rminnich@super.ORG (Ronald G Minnich)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: UW
Message-ID: <6354@super.ORG>
Date: 23 Feb 89 21:20:43 GMT
References: <6106@super.ORG> <418a531c.1285f@maize.engin.umich.edu> <6591@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Sender: news@super.ORG
Reply-To: rminnich@brainiac.UUCP (Ronald G Minnich)
Distribution: na
Organization: Supercomputing Research Center, Lanham, Md.
Lines: 12

In article <6591@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> kpmancus@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Keith P. Mancus) writes:
>	I couldn't get dnet to work on phoenix, our VAX-8700 running
>ULTRIX 2.0.  UW works fine.  I'm planning to make some minor changes
gee, i can't believe this. all these people who can't get dnet running. 
i have run it on several versions of ultra-icks, sunos 3.x and 4.0 and
4.02, 4.[2,3] bsd, and who knows what all. What the !@#$ is going 
on? ALl i ever do to get it to go is 'make'. You folks all running 
old dead code, or what?
Or maybe i am running such old code that it always works.
??
I will say uw was nice, dnet is much, much better. worth the effort.
ron