Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!killer!elg
From: elg@killer.DALLAS.TX.US (Eric Green)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: New Serial Port Board (Less Expensive)
Message-ID: <7306@killer.DALLAS.TX.US>
Date: 25 Feb 89 02:35:53 GMT
References: <36918@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Organization: The Unix(R) Connection, Dallas, Texas
Lines: 18

in article <36918@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>, erd@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Ethan R. Dicks) says:
$ In article <oY15sUy00Uka4CRLxN@andrew.cmu.edu> bader+@andrew.cmu.edu (Miles Bader) writes:
$>perry@madnix.UUCP (Perry Kivolowitz) writes:
$>> including  rear connector mounting) comes out with 2 DB-9 ``AT'' compatible
$>> ports which include:
$>This sounds all very nice, but... why are you using connectors that
$>are incompatible with what the amiga's serial port uses?  I'm tired of
$>making strange adaptor cables!

Note that this is standard Pee-Cee stuff, a two-port RS232 card (although
it sells for $50 in PC-land :-}. Every dealer in Computer Shopper
carries funny-looking cables to go from two DB9s to two modems or
whatever. 

--
|    // Eric Lee Green              P.O. Box 92191, Lafayette, LA 70509     |
|   //  ..!{ames,decwrl,mit-eddie,osu-cis}!killer!elg     (318)989-9849     |
| \X/              >> In Hell you need 4Mb to Multitask <<                  |