Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!gatech!udel!princeton!njin!aramis.rutgers.edu!elbereth.rutgers.edu!shieh From: shieh@elbereth.rutgers.edu (Andrew Shieh) Newsgroups: comp.sys.att Subject: Re: Users of Wollongong's WIN/3B Release 2.1 Message-ID: Date: 16 Feb 89 23:31:51 GMT References: <928@cs.rit.edu> Distribution: usa Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 38 Yes, I have problems with Wollongong's TCP/IP. I am a system programmer and my duty is to support all the 3b2 and 3b15 machines donated by AT&T. I encountered several problems after I have installed the Enchanced TCP/IP WIN/3B Release 1.1 interface packages which are also donated by AT&T. Although I upgraded the package to release 2.1 on the 3B2 machines, these problems still exist. The problems which I have are as follows: 1. The sendmail program cannot receive the mail from BSD UNIX machines (SUNOS, BSD 4.2 or above). I have the 5.58 sendmail source code and left it untouched to compile on 3b2/400 using version 4.2 C compiler. This sendmail did not work either. I got the write error on socket operation. I tried to substitute the Socket compatible library to TLI library. I got the illegal address error message when I tried to t_bind the packet. (Paul, Can you please show me your piece of code to t_bind the local port properly?) 2. The ftp program did not work when I tried to use the put command to put a file on BSD UNIX machines. It produced a zero byte file. 3. I also have the "plp" source code and I tried to port to System V to have networking printing and you know it has the socket calls everywhere. I need a GOOD copy of libnet.a library to make it work. BTW, I have System V release 3.1, WIN TCP/IP release 2.1, and Networking Support Utilities release 1.2 running under either 3b2/310 or 3b2/400. I have System V release 2.1.1 and WIN TCP/IP release 1.1 running under 3B15. I have called the AT&T hotline many times. They were not able to help me in anyway. I was told that the problems would be solved in the next release (3.0?).