Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!calorie.cis.ohio-state.edu!schanck
From: schanck@calorie.cis.ohio-state.edu (Christopher Schanck)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: DESQview - who makes it?
Message-ID: <36336@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 21 Feb 89 18:37:58 GMT
References: <24009478@ralf>
Sender: news@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Reply-To: Christopher Schanck <schanck@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Organization: Ohio State University Computer and Information Science
Lines: 20

In article <24009478@ralf> Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU writes:
>And by all reports on the DESQVIEW conference on Fidonet, v2.24 is rotten to
>the core, and people should stick to v2.21 or v2.22 until Quarterdeck comes
>out with fixes to the MAJOR bugs introduced by 2.24.
>
>Disclaimer: I am running 2.22, and haven't seen 2.24 myself....

Could you summarize what the problems are with v2.24? Seems odd that
a supposedly incremental upgrade should add so many problems. 'Course,
if there weren't problems, software would be perfect, and lots of us
would be out of jobs...:-)

Chris



-=-
"The future of the human race is in the hands of the telephone company!"
			--- Dr. Harrison Blackwood, "War of the Worlds"
Christopher Schanck --> schanck@.cis.ohio-state.edu