Xref: utzoo comp.sys.atari.st:14249 comp.sys.apple:10263 comp.sys.mac:27259 comp.sys.ibm.pc:25202 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!yale!husc6!husc4!clubok From: clubok@husc4.HARVARD.EDU (Kenneth Clubok) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.apple,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Right of reply, virus- public, private- a thin line Message-ID: <1270@husc6.harvard.edu> Date: 24 Feb 89 17:49:09 GMT References: <415@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk> <14940@cup.portal.com> <3936@ttidca.TTI.COM> Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu Reply-To: clubok@husc4.UUCP (Kenneth Clubok) Organization: Harvard University Science Center, Cambridge MA Lines: 23 In all of this discussion on proliferating information about viruses, it seems that the proponents of free exchange of information argue that it is impossible to keep the information from those who want to make viruses, while that information may be helpful to prevent their spread. I would contend that neither statement is true. Sure, anyone who is technically minded can find the information in the manuals, but that is still a far cry from actually finding source code listings in a magazine. When source code is distributed, anyone with an assembler can make minor modifications to the code that will make the "mutant" virus undetectible by current virus detection programs. This requires neither very much work nor much understaning of the workings of viruses. Thus, while some people will always be able to make new viruses, it is possible to minimize that by restricting discussion. On the other hand, I seriously doubt that publishing source codes is very useful for preventing the spread of viruses. If a source code is published, then it already has been disassembled and analyzed, and a method of detecting and removing it has been found. All that needs to be spread is that method, or better yet, PD programs to do the job, but not the actual source code for the viruses. In short, I believe that the inevitable proliferation of mutants completely outweighs the minimal advantages of publishing source codes. Best to keep the discussion to how to protect against viruses -- not how to make them. Just thought I'd put my two-cents in. Ken Clubok, Clubok@husc4.bitnet