Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!cssisg.dec.com!uban From: uban@cssisg.dec.com Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Source is not free Message-ID: <8902172034.AA29857@decwrl.dec.com> Date: 17 Feb 89 20:34:55 GMT Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 40 In mail posted: 15 Feb 89 21:11:17 GMT, Steve Cumming stevec@lccr.cs.sfu.ca {uunet|...}!ubc-cs!fornax!stevec writes: > > I plan to buy my Very Own Computer one day soon. > I want it to be fast, powerful, Unix like - as much > . . . > I also want source code, for several reasons, all of > which I am sure are familiar to all of us. > All my own experience at work moves me to insist > on source. > . . . > Where does this leave me? I am going to wait until the > FSF has a kernel working. > . . . > And about two years later, if not sooner, some outfit will > start selling iron that FSF kernels are specially good with. > . . . Waiting for FSF to do it will probably be the only way most individuals can end up with Un*x-ish source on any machine that they personally own and control. Mach (I think) and BSD and others are all limbs on the source tree that roots back to AT&T. Any group or individual that wants source to -any- of these must also purchase a source license from AT&T. This runs a tidy $15K to $40K, depending on discounts, I believe. Therefore NeXT may not, by law, distribute any source except to organizations or individuals already licensed. BSD is the same - once one has a license, then one can simply ask Berkely for a source tape, but not before. Even within organizations, separate groups must have separate source licenses to work on or even view the source, it seems. We find that here at DEC, I've heard, even though Ultrix is one of our main products. Universities with source have purchased the license. One who works at a university and buys, say, a SUN, may not copy the university's SUN source to their personal machine. This fact will probably never change. - Jim - uban%cssisg@decwrl.dec.com