Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!husc6!rice!sun-spots-request From: bcsaic!paula@june.cs.washington.edu (Paul Allen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Re: Additional Sun upgrade please Message-ID: <10095@bcsaic.UUCP> Date: 23 Feb 89 11:02:54 GMT References: <2555@kalliope.rice.edu> Sender: usenet@rice.edu Organization: Boeing Computer Services AI Center, Seattle Lines: 42 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu Original-Date: 14 Feb 89 04:45:45 GMT X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 168, message 6 of 10 X-Issue-Reference: v7n144 fitz@cive.ri.cmu.edu (Kerien Fitzpatrick) writes: >[describes an awful problem with 3/75's losing power supplies and backplanes, compounded by the lack of a full maintenance contract.] I don't remember seeing this discussed in Sun-Spots before now, so here's a description of our experience with the 3/75. We bought our 3/75's when they were first announced and currently have about 10 of them. We've replaced power supplies, and sometimes the whole enclosure, on all of them. The problem is the connector between the power supply and the backplane. The contacts oxidize over time, resulting in heat generation and ultimately a burned connector. The worst one I saw was so badly 'carbonized' that the connector crumbled when we tried to unplug it. In most cases, Sun field service simply replaced the power supply after carefully cleaning off the posts that the connector fits over. We had a couple cases in which things were so far gone that the engineer judged it necessary to replace the whole base. I can only think of one machine that has had this fix applied more than once. We haven't had a 75 fail in a long time. I would think that it should be possible to fix a failed 3/75 by simply picking up a new connector at your local electronics supply house and replacing the burned one. This assumes that the situation hasn't gone so far that the backplane has suffered damage. Kerien described having to wait 30 days for Sun to fix a machine. The investment of a couple hours in replacing the connector would seem to be worthwhile! The critical point is that the backplane must be undamaged, and the posts that the connector fits over must be scraped completely free of oxidation. >It sure would be nice if Sun would be magnanimous and say "hey, we made a >mistake . . . " and give 3/75 owners a good deal on upgrading to a 3/160 >housing. ... I agree that Sun should fix these problems, since it's clearly caused by a poor quality connector. The presence or absence of a maintenance contract should be irrelevant. Computers that break because of shoddy materials are bad for business! Paul Allen Paul L. Allen | pallen@atc.boeing.com Boeing Advanced Technology Center | ...!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!bcsaic!pallen