Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!ukc!strath-cs!glasgow!bru-cc!linda From: linda@cc.brunel.ac.uk (Linda Birmingham) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: reading dump tape with bad spots Message-ID: <643@Terra.cc.brunel.ac.uk> Date: 21 Feb 89 14:28:29 GMT References: <1084@wpg.UUCP> <472@avsd.UUCP> <1086@wpg.UUCP> Reply-To: linda@cc.brunel.ac.uk (Linda Birmingham) Organization: Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK Lines: 37 In article <1086@wpg.UUCP> russ@wpg.UUCP (Russell Lawrence) writes: >> In article <1084@wpg.UUCP> I wrote: >> >Does anyone know of any PD dump/dumpdir/restor programs persistent >> >enough to skip over bad spots on tape? > >In article <472@avsd.UUCP>, childers@avsd.UUCP (Richard Childers) writes: Advice on validation of dumps. Having had tape errors on a couple of tapes recently, we are becoming a little paranoid about dumps too. I thought about using dd as a validation method but we found that that read a particular tape error as end of file so to all intents and purposes the tape looked ok, except it only read 10 blocks %-}. I was also advised to restore the last file from a dump tape. That sounds a more rigorous validation to me. >I'm still hoping that someone will suggest a recovery procedure that will >bail me out. Nevertheless, the experience has convinced me that I >should abandon dump/restor and opt instead for ctar or pax.... given >their ability to skip over bad spots. Sounds interesting. > >If I knew more about dump headers, I suppose I could hack something out >that could look for the appropriate file on the tape (ie inode number) >and retrieve the data. Any comments? I think that's a good idea Russell, let me know when you've done it :-) Someone somewhere MUST have already done it though. BTW we also have a Pyramid 9820 with a Fujitsu tape drive. Linda. -- Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, England. janet: linda@uk.ac.brunel.cc | :-) uucp:...ukc!cc.brunel!linda |