Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!pyramid!prls!mips!daver!athsys!jim From: jim@athsys.uucp (Jim Becker) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: Re: X slow on colour suns? Message-ID: <249@tityus.UUCP> Date: 21 Feb 89 02:10:17 GMT References: <245@tityus.UUCP> Organization: Athena Systems, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA Lines: 29 From article <245@tityus.UUCP>, by jim@athsys.uucp (Jim Becker): > From article , by bob@tinman.cis.ohio-state.edu (Bob Sutterfield): >> In article <1989Feb10.105927.20572@radio.astro.utoronto.ca> brian@radio.astro.utoronto.ca (Brian Glendenning) writes: >> If colour suns really are this slow when will things improve? Is >> Sun selling X yet? Presumably it would be faster :-) >> > At the local X User Group someone in the audience said that > they were using an alpha version of the Sun server. They said that the > monochrome version of the server is three times faster than the MIT > sample server and the color version is five times faster than the MIT > server. Sun is committed to having the very best server out there. > > -Jim Becker ...!sun!athsys!jim I was corrected by a representative of Sun. These are _stated_ performance goals for FCS, but may not represent the current numbers. I believe that this statement was made by a Daisy employee, not someone speaking for Sun Microsystems (but I may be wrong here again). This was at the Bay Area X meeting, at the Daisy cafeteria... How do I keep managing to put my foot in my mouth so bad? I will be moving from Athena to Sun, to help work on their X11/News effort. Then I can just shut up and help make the numbers fact... (oh happy day, oh happy day...) -Jim Becker ...!sun!athsys!jim