Path: utzoo!mnetor!geac!geaclib!rae
From: rae@geaclib.UUCP (Reid Ellis)
Newsgroups: ont.singles
Subject: `interesting' dates
Summary: Eeek!  A relevant topic emerges from the primordial slime..
Keywords: date, interesting, compatability, common interests
Message-ID: <3691@geaclib.UUCP>
Date: 17 Feb 89 16:06:00 GMT
References: <1989Feb13.122051.29651@ziebmef.uucp> <89Feb14.101829est.38059@neat.ai.toronto.edu> <1121@utflis.UUCP> <89Feb16.155135est.38034
Reply-To: rae@geaclib.UUCP (Reid Ellis)
Distribution: ont
Organization: T'nir Software
Lines: 25

gara@theory.toronto.edu (Gara Pruesse) writes:
|I used "interesting" in the sense of "would be fun to date"

Ok, now we get to define "fun to date"..

But seriously, doesn't this exclude a relatively large number of guys who
are uncomfortable with the archtypical fun date? [dining, dancing] [but not
movies, they're ok]

Would you consider it to be fun to walk down Queen Street on a Friday
afternoon hunting out all the book stores and comic shops to see what's new
this week?  And then go see the current Cinesphere 70mm festival movie?
[it's Top Gun :-)]

Or talking about technology in general? [cars CPU's VCR's C++]  Are there
females out there who really *like* to talk about these kinds of things in
detail?  Like, could they stay up until 2am talking about these things?  Ok,
that's a bit extreme :-) but you get the drift.

In my amazing, earth-shattering world of experience, I have yet to find
same.  This is really more of an observation than a comment.

					Reid
-- 
Reid Ellis, geaclib!rae@geac.uucp, rae@geaclib.uucp [if you're lucky]