Xref: utzoo rec.autos:15440 sci.electronics:5165 misc.consumers:8694
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wasatch!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!att!mtuxo!bb
From: bb@mtuxo.att.com (52332-B.BARMAK)
Newsgroups: rec.autos,sci.electronics,misc.consumers
Subject: Re: Radar Detectors (Ka band) ...
Summary: please explain!!!
Keywords: radar, cops, Ka, X, K
Message-ID: <4160@mtuxo.att.com>
Date: 15 Feb 89 15:55:03 GMT
References: <603@icus.islp.ny.us> <7944@netnews.upenn.edu> <7169@killer.DALLAS.TX.US>
Organization: AT&T, Middletown NJ
Lines: 13

In article <7169@killer.DALLAS.TX.US>, sampson@killer.DALLAS.TX.US (Steve Sampson) writes:
> 
> The best defense for Ka band photo radars is to simply ignore the summons.
> They send you a picture in the mail with a request that you appear and pay
> a fine.  Since there is some legal problems in that, they don't go after the
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> people who ignore the summons.

Please explain what these legal problems are. I am interested to 
find out. Anyone else who knows some facts please post or e-mail
to mtuxo!bb. Thanks.
						512BB