Xref: utzoo rec.autos:15450 sci.electronics:5169 misc.consumers:8705
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!eecae!netnews.upenn.edu!rutgers!att!cbnews!gws
From: gws@cbnews.ATT.COM (Gary W. Sanders)
Newsgroups: rec.autos,sci.electronics,misc.consumers
Subject: Re: Radar Detectors (Ka band) ...
Keywords: radar, cops, Ka, X, K
Message-ID: <4042@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Date: 15 Feb 89 20:54:06 GMT
References: <603@icus.islp.ny.us> <7944@netnews.upenn.edu> <7169@killer.DALLAS.TX.US> <4160@mtuxo.att.com>
Reply-To: gws@cbnews.ATT.COM (Gary W. Sanders)
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 19

In article <4160@mtuxo.att.com> bb@mtuxo.att.com (52332-B.BARMAK) writes:


With the new KA band  photo radars, you apparently need a good
photo of the car and/or driver to make any kind of charges stick.

It seems to me that some polarized license plate covers or somthing that 
forced the "viewer" to be directly in front(or rear) to see the tag
number might work. most states have laws that force you to have your 
tags in view, but is any kind of viewing angle include? Looks like a
neat test case is in order. And what about the driver. I light tint
on the upper part of a windshield might sove this problem. Also
what about states that have no front tags, only rear, how do you get a
good picture of the driver and rear tag at the same time?


-- 
Gary Sanders (N8EMR) gws@cbnews (w) gws@n8emr (h)
614-860-5965 (353-5965 cornet)