Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi From: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: zoo'ed IBM-PC binaries? Summary: Some things to keep in mind Message-ID: <5957@bsu-cs.UUCP> Date: 28 Feb 89 04:39:25 GMT Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana Lines: 39 I ask you all to note a few things. Roy Bixler asked me if I might want to switch to using zoo format for comp.binaries.ibm.pc. I told him that I would if that's the way users wanted to go, and suggested that he ask. I will happily go with whatever the consensus is. Please don't send me any votes by email, and please don't post any votes. I am not collecting votes on this issue, because I am probably biased. If any voting is done it should be (a) organized by one or more relatively impartial people, and (b) done solely via private email. So, I request all users to avoid casting votes by posting articles. Please post an article on this issue only if you have some important points to make, either pro or con. So *if* the comp.{sys,binaries}.ibm.pc community holds an impartial vote, and *if* there is a 2:1 vote in favor of zoo, I will change to zoo format, and also drop my zoo distribution restrictions as I described earlier. P.S. My own selfish point of view is that using zoo format would be much better for me. It's not just because I wrote it. I can do a lot more with zoo archives, on our 4.3BSD system here, including commands like: for f in `zoo lfq xyz`; do; zoo xpq xyz $f | cmp - $f; done which compares each archived file in xyz.zoo with its disk copy and reports if they are different. I can search a bunch of zoo archives for a file with a simple UNIX command like "zoo L *.zoo | grep name". Among the tools I use for moderation arc is the bottleneck because of its slow speed and lack of flexibility. The easier life is for me the better a job of moderation I can do. -- Rahul Dhesi UUCP: !{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi ARPA: dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu