Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!killer!igloo!bhv From: bhv@igloo.Scum.COM (Bronis Vidugiris) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: ZMODEM Keywords: zmodem file transfer cheapskates Message-ID: <1179@igloo.Scum.COM> Date: 1 Mar 89 00:29:08 GMT References: <1163@igloo.Scum.COM> <4700@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> Reply-To: bhv@igloo.UUCP (Bronis Vidugiris) Distribution: usa Organization: igloo, Northbrook, IL Lines: 51 In article <4700@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson) writes: >In article <1163@igloo.Scum.COM> bhv@igloo.Scum.COM (Bronis Vidugiris) writes: >> >>Is there a ZMODEM file transfer program out there that is less 'obnoxious' >>than the DSZ from Omen that was recently posted to comp.binaries.ibm.pc? > >The DSZ transfer protocol is NOT free. If you are making regular use of >it you deserve to send your payment to Omen Technologies and pay for what >you're getting. > >The only thing "obnoxious" about all this is complaints that people who do >(good) work shouldn't be paid. > >>I'm really tired of being 'nagged' by the program to send in my >>'contribution', I personaly would prefer to use a true-blue public domain >>program - or, if this is not available, shareware that is reasonably >>discreete about 'asking' for contributions. > >Well, wouldn't we all! I'd like to go to the grocery store and fill up my >cart full of groceries for free, too. But I don't think the store manager >is 'obnoxious' because he expects my money for his groceries! > >keith Let me start off by saying that when I posted this article, I had used dsz exactly _once_. That, (plus the doc's) was all I needed to get tired of the program. You say 'ZMODEM is not free'. My understanding (from reading the most recent issue of Byte) is that the ZMODEM protocol itself _is_ public domain, and its development was funded by a major modem maufacturer (I don't recall which one offhand). The DSZ documentation does refer to 'other implementations' as well. I would like to obtain one of these 'other implementations' because _I_ personally _do_ find the documenation and general attitude of the author 'obnoxious' - and I am not in an environment where the (presumed) technical merits of (presumed) 'high quality code' are important to me. I am quite willing to live with something that is a little 'buggy', but is public domain rather than blatantly commercial like DSZ. One of the reasons that I specifically dislike DSZ's commercialism is that there is a long past history of public domain communications protocols - and I would like to see these protocols remain in the public domain, and _not_ be commercialized. Just imagine the state of affairs of telecomunications if Ward Christensen had decided to copyright and commercialize 'XMODEM'. BRTW, as far as I know (which is not definite, but I could get more info if necessary), Ward Christensen has never received a dime for the concept of 'XMODEM'. -- bhv@igloo