Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c++:2688 comp.software-eng:1182 news.admin:4944 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!oliveb!sun!integral!dhare From: dhare%integral@Sun.COM (Dwight Hare) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.software-eng,news.admin Subject: Re: "What is Object-Oriented Programming?" by Stroustrup Message-ID: <91716@sun.uucp> Date: 28 Feb 89 23:35:05 GMT References: <137@mole-end.UUCP> <529@sirius.UUCP> <4736@pbhyf.PacBell.COM> <91533@sun.uucp> <1989Feb28.172023.17877@utzoo.uucp> Sender: news@sun.uucp Reply-To: dhare@sun.UUCP (Dwight Hare) Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View Lines: 39 In article <1989Feb28.172023.17877@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes: >[news.admin cross-posting added -- this is important] > >In article <91533@sun.uucp> dhare@sun.UUCP (Dwight Hare) writes: >>>Could someone post this excellent article so that those of us who don't get >>>IEEE Software can also read it? Thanks. >> >>I took this as an opportunity to play with my new OCR system. I hope that >>I'm not violating any netnews rules by posting a copyrighted article. > >Yes, you are, the most important one of all: Thou shalt not endanger the >net for thine own pleasure. Posting copyrighted material is a copyright >violation. You can get sued for that. Worse, there is a distinct chance >that sites which pass it on might get sued as well. (Whether such suits >have a chance of succeeding is a different issue; they will do damage even >if they don't.) > >ALL SYSTEM ADMINISTRATORS READING THIS: ARTICLE <91533@sun.uucp> IS A >MAJOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT THAT PUTS YOUR SITE IN DANGER. I WOULD MOST >STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT YOU REMOVE IT AT ONCE. >-- >The Earth is our mother; | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology >our nine months are up. | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu Yes, you're quite right. I have notified usenet central, the author of the article, and the Manager of Intellectual Property Rights at IEEE Publishing. I have requested that the article be cancelled. I have been assured by IEEE that no litigation will result from this. I apologize for endangering the net, although I resent the implication that I purposely endangered the net for my own "pleasure". I have seen many newswire stories quoted verbatim on the net, so there is a large education problem. I hope that my experience helps to further that education. I would also encourage all who so quickly responded to my mistake that they just as quickly respond to requests that copyrighted material be posted (my posting was a response to such a request, and several days had elapsed between the request and my posting). Again my apologies to all.