Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!uw-june!uw-entropy!dataio!pilchuck!ssc!mcgp1!dms
From: dms@mcgp1.UUCP (David Stanhope)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Should C++ follow C's footsteps?
Summary: I want my chocolate watch
Message-ID: <1787@mcgp1.UUCP>
Date: 5 Mar 89 22:22:32 GMT
References: <4800051@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <8902@alice.UUCP> <2490@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk>
Organization: McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc., Seattle, WA
Lines: 18

In article <2490@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk>, orr@cs.glasgow.ac.uk (Fraser Orr) writes:
> Silly comment, with a serious point at the end.
> In article <36818@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> john hall <hall@cis.ohio-state.edu> writes:
> >In article <2438@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> orr%cs.glasgow.ac.uk@nss.cs.ucl.ac.uk (Fraser Orr) writes:
[DELETED]
> and so much easier to read. I propose that all keywords be eliminated
> and replaced by stupid symbols ...
> 	#(i=0; i<MAX; i++) { $(a[i].val) { j++ ; % ; } ^ & ; } ;

for (i=0; i<MAX; i++) { if (a[i].val) { j++; break; } else continue; };


> A chocolate watch for the first person who can tell me what the above
> does <^:

I kinda like your idea.

I want my chocolate watch!!